Confrontation Clause and Testimonial Evidence: After Two Supreme Court Decisions, Standard Remains Unclear.

Alan Raphael

Confrontation Clause and Testimonial Evidence: After Two Supreme Court Decisions, Standard Remains Unclear.

Alan Raphael

Loyola University Chicago, School of Law

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article

Original language	American English
Journal	Loyola Public Interest Law Reporter
Volume	12
Issue number	1
State	Published - 2006

Bibliographical note

ALan Raphael, Confrontation Clause and Testimonial Evidence: After Two Supreme Court Decisions, Standard Remains Unclear, 12 Pub. Int. L. Rep. 1 (2006).

Disciplines

Courts
Evidence
Law

Access to Document

Confrontation Clause and Testimonial Evidence After Two SupremeFinal published version, 1 MBLicense: Unspecified

Cite this

@article{ce13597fde3042c3bded1ed7c31a447c,

title = "Confrontation Clause and Testimonial Evidence: After Two Supreme Court Decisions, Standard Remains Unclear.",

author = "Alan Raphael",

note = "ALan Raphael, Confrontation Clause and Testimonial Evidence: After Two Supreme Court Decisions, Standard Remains Unclear, 12 Pub. Int. L. Rep. 1 (2006).",

year = "2006",

language = "American English",

volume = "12",

journal = "Loyola Public Interest Law Reporter",

issn = "1087-2159",

number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Confrontation Clause and Testimonial Evidence: After Two Supreme Court Decisions, Standard Remains Unclear.

AU - Raphael, Alan

N1 - ALan Raphael, Confrontation Clause and Testimonial Evidence: After Two Supreme Court Decisions, Standard Remains Unclear, 12 Pub. Int. L. Rep. 1 (2006).

PY - 2006

Y1 - 2006

UR - https://lawecommons.luc.edu/facpubs/104

M3 - Article

SN - 1087-2159

VL - 12

JO - Loyola Public Interest Law Reporter

JF - Loyola Public Interest Law Reporter

IS - 1

ER -

Confrontation Clause and Testimonial Evidence: After Two Supreme Court Decisions, Standard Remains Unclear.

Bibliographical note

Disciplines

Access to Document

Other files and links

Cite this