Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Deciding When Hate Is a Crime: The First Amendment, Police Detectives, and the Identification of Hate Crime

  • Indiana University Maurer School of Law

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

This Article adds to the debate a story of how hate crime law is enforced, based on the experiences of the police detectives who are required to enforce hate crime law. Part I of this Article provides a brief description of hate crime laws and argues that the police play an important role in the determination of how hate crime law is enforced and ultimately, whether defendants’ First Amendment rights will be respected. Part II describes critics’ concerns about defendants’ First Amendment rights and the narrow constitutional line that enforcers of hate crime law must walk between enforcing hate crime and policing free speech. In Part III, I describe how enforcers decide that incidents are hate crimes and argue that they are able to avoid the pitfalls identified by critics. The Article concludes in Part IV with a discussion of the disconnect between hate crimes and hate speech and an exploration of new justifications for hate crime law.
Original languageAmerican English
Pages (from-to)33-76
Number of pages44
JournalRutgers Race and the Law Review
Volume4
Issue number1
StatePublished - 2002
Externally publishedYes

Bibliographical note

Jeannine Bell, Deciding When Hate Is a Crime: The First Amendment, Police Detectives, and the Identification of Hate Crime, 4 Rutgers Race & L. Rev. 33 (2002).

Disciplines

  • Civil Rights and Discrimination
  • First Amendment
  • Law and Race
  • Law Enforcement and Corrections
  • Criminal Law

Cite this