Doctrines of Delusion: How the History of the G.I. Bill and Other Inconvenient Truths Undermine the Supreme Court’s Affirmative Action Jurisprudence

Juan F Perea

Doctrines of Delusion: How the History of the G.I. Bill and Other Inconvenient Truths Undermine the Supreme Court’s Affirmative Action Jurisprudence

Juan F Perea

Loyola University Chicago, School of Law

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article

Original language	American English
Journal	University of Pittsburgh Law Review
Volume	75
Issue number	4
State	Published - 2014

Bibliographical note

Juan F. Perea, Doctrines of Delusion: How the History of the G.I. Bill and Other Inconvenient Truths Undermine the Supreme Court’s Affirmative Action Jurisprudence. 75 U. Pitt. L. Rev. 583 (2014).

Disciplines

Civil Rights and Discrimination
Constitutional Law
Law

Access to Document

Doctrines of Delusion How the History of the GFinal published version, 3.52 MBLicense: Unspecified

Cite this

@article{c035beeef9714c6790e2641bc2ede722,

title = "Doctrines of Delusion: How the History of the G.I. Bill and Other Inconvenient Truths Undermine the Supreme Court{\textquoteright}s Affirmative Action Jurisprudence",

author = "Perea, \{Juan F\}",

note = "Juan F. Perea, Doctrines of Delusion: How the History of the G.I. Bill and Other Inconvenient Truths Undermine the Supreme Court{\textquoteright}s Affirmative Action Jurisprudence. 75 U. Pitt. L. Rev. 583 (2014).",

year = "2014",

language = "American English",

volume = "75",

journal = "University of Pittsburgh Law Review",

issn = "1942-8405",

number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Doctrines of Delusion: How the History of the G.I. Bill and Other Inconvenient Truths Undermine the Supreme Court’s Affirmative Action Jurisprudence

AU - Perea, Juan F

N1 - Juan F. Perea, Doctrines of Delusion: How the History of the G.I. Bill and Other Inconvenient Truths Undermine the Supreme Court’s Affirmative Action Jurisprudence. 75 U. Pitt. L. Rev. 583 (2014).

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

UR - https://lawecommons.luc.edu/facpubs/543

M3 - Article

SN - 1942-8405

VL - 75

JO - University of Pittsburgh Law Review

JF - University of Pittsburgh Law Review

IS - 4

ER -

Doctrines of Delusion: How the History of the G.I. Bill and Other Inconvenient Truths Undermine the Supreme Court’s Affirmative Action Jurisprudence

Bibliographical note

Disciplines

Access to Document

Other files and links

Cite this