Is “Relevant Conduct” Relevant? Reconsidering the Guidelines’ Approach to Real Offense Sentencing

David N. Yellen

Is “Relevant Conduct” Relevant? Reconsidering the Guidelines’ Approach to Real Offense Sentencing

David N. Yellen

Loyola University Chicago, School of Law

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article

Original language	American English
Journal	Saint Louis University Law Journal
Volume	44
Issue number	2
State	Published - 2000

Bibliographical note

David N. Yellen, Is “Relevant Conduct” Relevant? Reconsidering the Guidelines’ Approach to Real Offense Sentencing, 44 St. Louis U. L. J. 409 (2000).

Disciplines

Criminal Law
Criminal Procedure
Law

Access to Document

Is Relevant Conduct Relevant Reconsidering the Guidelines ApFinal published version, 749 KBLicense: Unspecified

Cite this

@article{2c5cb4e655d04f19aee5f496fa15cd95,

title = "Is “Relevant Conduct” Relevant? Reconsidering the Guidelines{\textquoteright} Approach to Real Offense Sentencing",

author = "Yellen, \{David N.\}",

note = "David N. Yellen, Is “Relevant Conduct” Relevant? Reconsidering the Guidelines{\textquoteright} Approach to Real Offense Sentencing, 44 St. Louis U. L. J. 409 (2000).",

year = "2000",

language = "American English",

volume = "44",

journal = "Saint Louis University Law Journal",

number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Is “Relevant Conduct” Relevant? Reconsidering the Guidelines’ Approach to Real Offense Sentencing

AU - Yellen, David N.

N1 - David N. Yellen, Is “Relevant Conduct” Relevant? Reconsidering the Guidelines’ Approach to Real Offense Sentencing, 44 St. Louis U. L. J. 409 (2000).

PY - 2000

Y1 - 2000

UR - https://lawecommons.luc.edu/facpubs/309

M3 - Article

VL - 44

JO - Saint Louis University Law Journal

JF - Saint Louis University Law Journal

IS - 2

ER -

Is “Relevant Conduct” Relevant? Reconsidering the Guidelines’ Approach to Real Offense Sentencing

Bibliographical note

Disciplines

Access to Document

Other files and links

Cite this