Abstract
This Article presents a comprehensive, context-based theory which both places cross burning in its proper doctrinal framework and recognizes the history of cross burning as one of Ku Klux Klan-inspired terrorism directed at African Americans. The author prefaces critical commentary on the Supreme Court's decision in Virginia v. Black with analysis of the full landscape of cross burning cases including another issue to which others have paid little attention - the ways in which state courts have negotiated First Amendment challenges to cross burning statutes. Thoroughly examining cross burning from each of these perspectives, the Article argues that cross burning should be treated as hate crime, which may be prosecuted, rather than as constitutionally protected hate speech.
| Original language | American English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 335-89 |
| Number of pages | 55 |
| Journal | Harvard Civil Rights-Civil Liberties Law Review |
| Volume | 39 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| State | Published - 2004 |
| Externally published | Yes |
Bibliographical note
Jeannine Bell, O Say, Can You See: Free Expression by the Light of Fiery Crosses, 39 Harv. C.R.-C.L. L. Rev. 335 (2004).Disciplines
- Civil Rights and Discrimination
- First Amendment
- Law and Race
- Criminal Law
Cite this
- APA
- Standard
- Harvard
- Vancouver
- Author
- BIBTEX
- RIS