Abstract
Tribes are nations. This fundamental truth is often lost in the trust relationship. For most of the United States’ history, the trust relationship was used as a justification to control tribes and obtain their resources. The trust relationship took a new shape during the 1970s—tribal self-determination. Self-determination has resulted in many benefits for tribes; however, tribes still suffer from externally imposed constraints on their sovereignty, such as complex federal bureaucracy and limits on their jurisdiction. This Article argues removing the antiquated constraints on tribal sovereignty is required for the trust relationship to advance, and, once it advances, tribes will be able to operate as domestic nations.
| Original language | American English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 9-26 |
| Number of pages | 18 |
| Journal | Tulsa Law Review |
| Volume | 61 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| State | Published - 2025 |
Bibliographical note
Adam Crepelle, Tribes as Nations: The Future of the Trust Relationship, 61 Tulsa L. Rev. 9 (2025).Disciplines
- Indigenous, Indian, and Aboriginal Law
Cite this
- APA
- Standard
- Harvard
- Vancouver
- Author
- BIBTEX
- RIS